‘Defending Jacob’: When Love and Truth Collide

Michelle Dockery, Jaeden Martell, Chris Evans in ‘Defending Jacob’

I usually read the book before watching its adaptation. When the reverse occurs, it’s because the movie or TV series is so absorbing that it leads me to explore how the original story is written and more importantly, how it ends.

Defending Jacob is a 2012 crime novel written by award-winning author William Landay. The story is character-driven and deals with issues such as the essence of parental love, nature vs. nurture, certainty and doubts. Without giving out any spoilers, I can say that the ending of the book is a darker reality while the TV adaptation offers a glimmer of light.

One morning in the quiet town of Newton, MA, a 14 year-old boy, Ben Rifkin, is found stabbed to death in a park on his way to school. Another 14 year-old schoolmate Jacob Barber (Jaeden Martell) is later charged with first degree murder and tried as an adult according to the law of the State.

What turns this from just another murder mystery into a captivating 8-episode TV mini-series is the character depiction and the intriguing perspectives it presents. Parents Andy (Chris Evans) and Laurie Barber (Michelle Dockery) are totally loving and devoted to their only child Jacob, but their inner voices differ.

Andy, an assistant DA who is involved in the investigation initially, is convinced of his son’s innocence. While equally fervent in her love, as the trial reveals some incriminating evidence against Jacob, Laurie (Michelle Dockery) begins to doubt and is willing to seek the truth, even if it’s devastating.

Does love for your child mean unequivocal loyalty and trust? Is doubt a form of betrayal? Do genes determine actions? What about family background and upbringing, nature or nurture? And above all, can you know a person fully? Your spouse? Your child?

The eight episodes are not too long to explore these issues. I finished them in two days. Then right away to the book. After that, rewatched again. What first drew me to the series was Michelle Dockery. Yes, I’m always curious to see the post-Downton transfiguration of the cast… Lily James, Dan Matthews, and others. Dockery’s performance is effective and convincing here. Playing opposite the highly popular Chris Evans, they make an admirable couple, albeit maybe ten years younger than the book’s characters.

Jaeden Martell as Jacob is mystifying, not giving viewers any clues to his inner self, which is effective in a way so we can sense his parents’ frustration. Unlike Kevin (Ezra Miller) who instigates a school shooting in We Need to Talk About Kevin (2011), Jacob doesn’t appear to be a monster or the devil incarnate. His innocent look elevates the suspense. How much do we actually know our children? How much can we know?

Supporting cast is equally judicious. Cherry Jones as Jacob’s lawyer Joanna Klein is an apt choice and portrayal, as well as Detective Duffy (Betty Gabriel), instead of the male characters in the book. J. K. Simmons is eerily convincing as the grandfather, a figure Andy tries to bury in his memory. Jacob’s classmate Sarah (Jordan Alexa Davis) deserves a mention for her natural poise, an altered and a more fully developed character from the book.

This I disagree with some prominent critics: it is not too long. The 421 page book works well as a novel. The 8 episodes work well as an elaboration and interpretative performance of the novel. Those too impatient to go through them might have missed some fine details. The side stories are necessary to bring out the characters and give actors their chances of more fleshed-out, nuanced performance. Every episode moves the story forward with its smooth editing.

The ending of the mini-series offers a different scenario in contrast to the book. It’s a softer landing, which is acceptable but not as powerful and intense as the book’s harsher reality. The creator/screenwriter could have been tough enough to follow the book, as Landay’s plotting is remarkable. Nevertheless, the twists and turns of the story development remain intact overall. Defending Jacob is a highly watchable and riveting adaptation.

~ ~ ~ Ripples

Defending Jacob is created by Mark Bomback and directed by Morten Tyldum, now playing on Apple TV+

Published by


If she’s not birding by the Pond, Arti’s likely watching a movie, reading, or writing a review. Creator of Ripple Effects, bylines in Asian American Press, Vague Visages, Curator Magazine.

6 thoughts on “‘Defending Jacob’: When Love and Truth Collide”

    1. One unexpected consequence of the Pandemic: I’m appreciating mini-series more and more. Generally, a movie is bound by the 120 mins. convention, some much shorter. But for a mini-series, the story and subplots can be fleshed out more, thus character development can be enhanced.


  1. Your argument for it not being too long sounds convincing. Although it’s hard to imagine people thinking that when some series go on for years and so many episodes in each one.


    1. Here’s a contrary opinion. The Queen’s Gambit, do you have it on UK Netflix? I feel it would work better if tightened by two episodes instead of the seven. It’s also from a novel, which I haven’t read. But how many chess games can you play on the screen without being tedious?


  2. I watched this when i got a free trial for Apple TV. Very intriguing. I couldn’t make my mind up on guilt or innocence. Great acting from the parents and Jacob. Did you see Good Morning (I think it was called) with Reece Witherspoon and Jennifer Anniston? I like short series because it takes me ages to watch as I don’t see much t.v.
    Best wishes Charlotte

    Liked by 1 person

    1. For those who haven’t watched Defending Jacob, Spoiler Alert in this Comment.

      Hi Charlotte,

      I got a one year free Apple TV+ after getting a new iPhone recently. That’s why I’m exploring its shows. I know about The Morning Show, but haven’t watched it yet. Finished “Defending Jacob,” and started on “Dickinson”, a crazy, Generation Z’s take on the poet. Well, if that will draw young people to literature and poetry, I’m fine with it.

      In your comment, you said “I couldn’t make my mind up on guilt or innocence.” I think this is exactly what the director wants to leave us with: uncertainty. We don’t know if Jacob is actually the killer of Ben or not. The alleged ‘suicide death’ of Patz is what’s being known to the public and the police, who presume his guilt. Beneath the cover, both Andy and Laurie know Patz didn’t kill himself. But Andy still thinks Jacob is innocent, while Laurie has doubts. And the audience is left with their own interpretation.

      The crux is actually on the final section, did Laurie drive the car into the bridge on purpose to commit a murder suicide, or is it an accident? That is the ultimate intrigue. The book offers a different ending to the TV show, not as hopeful. Further, in the book, the girl Jacob meets in Mexico (Jamaica in the book) is found dead weeks later in the water. So, that is another presumption pointing to Jacob, substantiating Laurie’s doubts. Interesting to see the two different scenarios at the ending.

      Again, thanks for stopping by the Pond and throwing in your two pebbles. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s